It's another story that goes 'oh healthy eating is actually not very good for you'.
Well it is, so SHUT.UP.
I mean, take this, it's headline is: 'Why chocolate it better for you than blueberries'.
Excuse me, but I don't think blueberries are choc-ful (excuse the pun) of saturated fat!
I read on to see what their pathetic excuse existed of...
They claimed the sweet stuff was oh-so-much better for you because:
'Blueberries score highly on the oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) scale, but scientists are finding foods that are even higher - including dark chocolate.'
This 'reliable' information was given to us by someone called 'Angela'.
Angela?? Who the hell is Angela?
It doesn't even say Dr. Angela, or Angela, food scientist. It literally just says Angela.
I mean, they could have literally just picked someone off the street and said, "Oi love, what do you prefer- chocolate or blueberries?" It's actually a joke.
And even if chocolate DID have a few more anti-oxidants, it's still got more sugar and fat and would definitely make your arse grow much more than a tub of blueberries would.
I mean, what are these people on? Newspapers and magazines harp on about obesity rates daily saying how Britain is turning into a 'nation of fatties', well I'm not suprized if people are reading articles like this!
You can't go around telling everyone to eat healthily and then say "Oh chocolate is soooooo much healthier than fruit" because it's not!
They blatently just had webspace to fill so they decided to write some terrible artcle about 'health myths' that aren't even true and no one cares about.
Well don't!
If you've got nothing useful to say then shut the hell up and stop typing this rubbish.
No comments:
Post a Comment